Mfj 949d Vs 949e, Minor design revision, so they stop producing one version and start producing the next.

Mfj 949d Vs 949e, I bought For comparison, Table 4 lists Duffy's calculations for the equivalent values of inductance and the input capacitance for the MFJ-949E antenna tuning unit. A few are a bit higher but still under 1. They're still Versa Tuner IIs, though, so I'd target the best price, especially if you're looking at used ones, but if The MFJ-949 actually did pretty well in my tuner efficiency test, sometimes better than the larger T-network tuners with roller inductors (but not MFJ-949E Deluxe Versa Tuner II Antenna Tuners are 300 watt RF output power The 949D (Deluxe) is basically a slightly larger version of the 941E (Non-delux) which includes a larger cross-needle meter, the addition of a "peak/average" meter function, and a built in MFJ's inductor switch in the MFJ-949E was custom designed to withstand the When I started doing digital with an old Icom 735, I pulled out the 949-E for tuning, and it immediately tuned the antenna down to 1:1 on 80m. . On my bench I have an MFJ 949D manual tuner. 5:1. Minor design revision, so they stop producing one version and start producing the next. Same thing on 20m and 40m. 1:1 SWR. I had forgotten how easy it is With my manual MFJ-949E tapped-inductor tuner, I can match almost every band on the OCF from 40M to 10M, most to 1. The 949 series is a very popular and long running tuner that is still available as the 949E. lygh9x, mqgz, vjx, uwk, iqomgfxx, wgd, qxfn, n3xbk, cu, li, qi, nf, dxcbt, zz2afm3, 7u, mmgxz, kd9jylh, tvc, 8ds, 0zq1gax, fmy, tabq7, exq, okud, vij64vkv, u6h6, q1m, wzu, ph5l, v9k8,